vs
OpenFoot API vs iSports API (2026)
Short answer: OpenFoot API scores slightly higher (49 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose OpenFoot API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football developers who want a free-to-start REST API with fixtures, lineups, live events and shot-level xG, plus streams and webhooks on paid plans.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ want a lower entry price ($14/mo vs $49/mo)
Not ideal for: Other sports or xG outside the top five leagues; the API is football-only and still labelled beta.
What developers say
Newer football API with a free tier and low-priced paid plans. Only one thread names it, listing it at about $14 a month among cheap options for post-match stats next to Sportmonks and API-Football. A community MCP server and a couple of hobby repos use it; no hands-on reviews yet.
Choose iSports API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- ✓ need Basketball
Not ideal for: Projects needing other sports; the product pages cover football and basketball only.
What developers say
Asian football and basketball data API with livescore, odds and history. Evidence is thin: a few beginner questions and hobby repos use it, and a competitor's spam posts claim its mid-tier plans cost about double. No substantive independent reviews of quality, latency or support.
Side by side
| OpenFoot API | iSports API | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 49/100 (#58) | 45/100 (#83) |
| Popularity | 15 | 35 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 67 | 32 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from $14/mo | from $49/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Demo access | Demo access |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Football (soccer), Basketball |
| Data | Fixtures, Lineups, Odds, Predictions, Results, Live scores, Standings, xG | Fixtures, Historical data, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Streaming (SSE) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST, SSE, Webhooks | REST |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 1 | 4 |
| GitHub repos | 3 | 7 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is OpenFoot API or iSports API better?
- OpenFoot API scores slightly higher (49 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- Which is cheaper, OpenFoot API or iSports API?
- OpenFoot API: from $14/mo. iSports API: from $49/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do OpenFoot API and iSports API have a free tier?
- OpenFoot API: yes. iSports API: no.