vs
CricketData.org (CricAPI) vs iSports API (2026)
Short answer: CricketData.org (CricAPI) scores clearly higher overall (61 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose CricketData.org (CricAPI) if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Cricket score apps and hobby projects that want a free tier of 100 hits per day, with low-cost paid plans for more volume.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ want a lower entry price ($5.99/mo vs $49/mo)
- ✓ need Cricket
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Commercial projects on the free plan, which is personal and non-commercial, and projects needing sports other than cricket.
What developers say
CricketData.org (formerly CricAPI) is a cheap, popular choice for cricket hobby apps, with a free 100-hits-per-day tier and many beginner tutorials, Chrome extensions and small GitHub projects. Developers report reliability problems for live scores, even at about $12 a month, and an older complaint said live scores were missing. Few detailed reviews exist.
Choose iSports API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- ✓ need Football (soccer), Basketball
Not ideal for: Projects needing other sports; the product pages cover football and basketball only.
What developers say
Asian football and basketball data API with livescore, odds and history. Evidence is thin: a few beginner questions and hobby repos use it, and a competitor's spam posts claim its mid-tier plans cost about double. No substantive independent reviews of quality, latency or support.
Side by side
| CricketData.org (CricAPI) | iSports API | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 61/100 (#13) | 45/100 (#83) |
| Popularity | 52 | 35 |
| Community & reliability | 50 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 61 | 32 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from $5.99/mo | from $49/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Cricket | Football (soccer), Basketball |
| Data | Fantasy, Fixtures, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Team stats, Widgets | Fixtures, Historical data, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | REST |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Paid plans only | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 3 | 4 |
| GitHub repos | 346 | 7 |
| Community tone | Mixed | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is CricketData.org (CricAPI) or iSports API better?
- CricketData.org (CricAPI) scores clearly higher overall (61 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- Which is cheaper, CricketData.org (CricAPI) or iSports API?
- CricketData.org (CricAPI): from $5.99/mo. iSports API: from $49/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do CricketData.org (CricAPI) and iSports API have a free tier?
- CricketData.org (CricAPI): yes. iSports API: no.