vs
Sportmonks vs iSports API (2026)
Short answer: Sportmonks scores clearly higher overall (69 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose Sportmonks if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football apps and betting models that need many leagues, lineups, xG and stats on a self-serve monthly plan with a free tier and trial.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ need Cricket, Formula 1
- ✓ need commercial use allowed in the public terms
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Projects that need US sports or the full league list on a small budget; leagues per plan are capped and history is on Enterprise only.
What developers say
Widely used paid football data API for side projects, dashboards and betting models, with many wrappers and GitHub repos. Users like the stats depth and reasonable price versus Opta or Sportradar, but call it pricey for hobby use, say premium odds lack player props, and report unreliable live data and sales or custom-plan frustrations.
Choose iSports API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- ✓ need Basketball
Not ideal for: Projects needing other sports; the product pages cover football and basketball only.
What developers say
Asian football and basketball data API with livescore, odds and history. Evidence is thin: a few beginner questions and hobby repos use it, and a competitor's spam posts claim its mid-tier plans cost about double. No substantive independent reviews of quality, latency or support.
Side by side
| Sportmonks | iSports API | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 69/100 (#4) | 45/100 (#86) |
| Popularity | 76 | 35 |
| Community & reliability | 49 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 100 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 51 | 32 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from €29/mo | from $49/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | 14 days | Demo access |
| Sports | Football (soccer), Cricket, Formula 1 | Football (soccer), Basketball |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Lineups, News, Odds, Player stats, Predictions, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets, xG | Fixtures, Historical data, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | REST |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Allowed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 40 | 4 |
| GitHub repos | 207 | 7 |
| Community tone | Mixed | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is Sportmonks or iSports API better?
- Sportmonks scores clearly higher overall (69 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- Which is cheaper, Sportmonks or iSports API?
- Sportmonks: from €29/mo. iSports API: from $49/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do Sportmonks and iSports API have a free tier?
- Sportmonks: yes. iSports API: no.