vs
CricketData.org (CricAPI) vs Entity Sport (2026)
Short answer: CricketData.org (CricAPI) scores clearly higher overall (61 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose CricketData.org (CricAPI) if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Cricket score apps and hobby projects that want a free tier of 100 hits per day, with low-cost paid plans for more volume.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ want a lower entry price ($5.99/mo vs $150/mo)
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Commercial projects on the free plan, which is personal and non-commercial, and projects needing sports other than cricket.
What developers say
CricketData.org (formerly CricAPI) is a cheap, popular choice for cricket hobby apps, with a free 100-hits-per-day tier and many beginner tutorials, Chrome extensions and small GitHub projects. Developers report reliability problems for live scores, even at about $12 a month, and an older complaint said live scores were missing. Few detailed reviews exist.
Choose Entity Sport if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
- ✓ need Football (soccer), Basketball, Baseball
- ✓ want WebSocket push instead of polling
Not ideal for: Teams wanting one flat price across sports or an open free tier; plans are priced per sport and licensed to one domain and one app.
What developers say
Cricket-first provider used in a number of hobby cricket and IPL score sites, with a community SDK on GitHub. The one user opinion says it covers part of what a developer wanted for deep cricket stats but not all. Other hits are vendor-style posts; nothing on pricing, reliability or support.
Side by side
| CricketData.org (CricAPI) | Entity Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 61/100 (#13) | 51/100 (#43) |
| Popularity | 52 | 27 |
| Community & reliability | 50 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 100 |
| Developer experience | 61 | 43 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from $5.99/mo | from $150/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Cricket | Cricket, Football (soccer), Basketball, Baseball, American football, Ice hockey, Tennis |
| Data | Fantasy, Fixtures, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Team stats, Widgets | Fantasy, Fixtures, Odds, Play-by-play, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Team stats |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Streaming (WebSocket) |
| Protocols | REST | REST, WebSocket |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Paid plans only | Commercial: Paid plans only |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 3 | 3 |
| GitHub repos | 346 | 14 |
| Community tone | Mixed | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is CricketData.org (CricAPI) or Entity Sport better?
- CricketData.org (CricAPI) scores clearly higher overall (61 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
- Which is cheaper, CricketData.org (CricAPI) or Entity Sport?
- CricketData.org (CricAPI): from $5.99/mo. Entity Sport: from $150/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do CricketData.org (CricAPI) and Entity Sport have a free tier?
- CricketData.org (CricAPI): yes. Entity Sport: not disclosed.