vs
OpenLigaDB vs Entity Sport (2026)
Short answer: OpenLigaDB scores clearly higher overall (59 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose OpenLigaDB if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Hobby projects such as prediction games, stats apps and Bundesliga widgets that need free German football fixtures and results without an API key.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Production products needing guaranteed service, deep stats or odds; it is a community-maintained fixtures and results database.
What developers say
Free, keyless community JSON API focused on German football, used in prediction models, bots, a home-automation adapter and results videos. A user praises the simple matchday endpoint and the last-change-date call that avoids refetching. Coverage beyond German leagues is thin, and it is community-maintained so errors are possible. ODbL licence applies.
Choose Entity Sport if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
- ✓ need Cricket, Basketball, Baseball
- ✓ need live / in-play data
- ✓ want WebSocket push instead of polling
Not ideal for: Teams wanting one flat price across sports or an open free tier; plans are priced per sport and licensed to one domain and one app.
What developers say
Cricket-first provider used in a number of hobby cricket and IPL score sites, with a community SDK on GitHub. The one user opinion says it covers part of what a developer wanted for deep cricket stats but not all. Other hits are vendor-style posts; nothing on pricing, reliability or support.
Side by side
| OpenLigaDB | Entity Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 59/100 (#21) | 51/100 (#44) |
| Popularity | 47 | 27 |
| Community & reliability | 70 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 75 | 100 |
| Developer experience | 51 | 43 |
| Type | Free / open data | Sports data API |
| Starting price | Free tier | from $150/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Football (soccer), Ice hockey | Cricket, Football (soccer), Basketball, Baseball, American football, Ice hockey, Tennis |
| Data | Fixtures, Results, Live scores | Fantasy, Fixtures, Odds, Play-by-play, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Team stats |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Streaming (WebSocket) |
| Protocols | REST | REST, WebSocket |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: Paid plans only |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 5 | 3 |
| GitHub repos | 166 | 14 |
| Community tone | Mostly positive | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is OpenLigaDB or Entity Sport better?
- OpenLigaDB scores clearly higher overall (59 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
- Which is cheaper, OpenLigaDB or Entity Sport?
- OpenLigaDB: Free tier. Entity Sport: from $150/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do OpenLigaDB and Entity Sport have a free tier?
- OpenLigaDB: yes. Entity Sport: not disclosed.