Skip to content
sportdex.
BALLDONTLIE logovsEntity Sport logo

BALLDONTLIE vs Entity Sport (2026)

Short answer: BALLDONTLIE scores clearly higher overall (79 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.

From public data checked . How we know

BALLDONTLIE logo

Choose BALLDONTLIE if you…

Sports data API

79

Best for: Developers building sports apps, dashboards or AI-assisted projects who want stats, box scores and odds for many leagues from one REST API with a free entry plan.

  • ✓ want to start on a free tier
  • ✓ want a lower entry price ($9.99/mo vs $150/mo)
  • ✓ need Golf, Formula 1, MMA
  • ✓ need commercial use allowed in the public terms
  • ✓ build a betting product and need that allowed in the public terms

Not ideal for: Companies that want to offer a competing sports-data API or feed built on its data, which the terms forbid.

What developers say

Long-popular free NBA stats API, now covering NBA, NFL, MLB and EPL with a free tier and paid keys. Beginners use it for tutorials, React projects and portfolio apps; betting and fantasy builders pair it with odds feeds. Recommended as an alternative to nba_api and API-Sports. Little discussion of reliability or pricing.

Entity Sport logo

Choose Entity Sport if you…

Sports data API

51

Best for: Cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.

  • ✓ need Cricket
  • ✓ want WebSocket push instead of polling

Not ideal for: Teams wanting one flat price across sports or an open free tier; plans are priced per sport and licensed to one domain and one app.

What developers say

Cricket-first provider used in a number of hobby cricket and IPL score sites, with a community SDK on GitHub. The one user opinion says it covers part of what a developer wanted for deep cricket stats but not all. Other hits are vendor-style posts; nothing on pricing, reliability or support.

Side by side

 BALLDONTLIEEntity Sport
SportDex Score79/100 (#2)51/100 (#44)
Popularity7427
Community & reliability81Not enough data
Transparency100100
Developer experience6243
TypeSports data APISports data API
Starting pricefrom $9.99/mofrom $150/mo
Free tierYesNot disclosed
Free trial2 daysDemo access
SportsBasketball, American football, Baseball, Ice hockey, Football (soccer), Tennis, Golf, Formula 1, MMA, EsportsCricket, Football (soccer), Basketball, Baseball, American football, Ice hockey, Tennis
DataHistorical data, Odds, Play-by-play, Player props, Player stats, Live scores, Team statsFantasy, Fixtures, Odds, Play-by-play, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Team stats
DeliveryWebhooks + pollingStreaming (WebSocket)
ProtocolsREST, WebhooksREST, WebSocket
Live / in-playYesYes
Commercial useCommercial: AllowedCommercial: Paid plans only
Betting productsBetting: AllowedBetting: not disclosed
DocumentationDocsDocs
Developer discussions153
GitHub repos90214
Community toneMostly positiveToo little discussion

Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.

Quick answers

Is BALLDONTLIE or Entity Sport better?
BALLDONTLIE scores clearly higher overall (79 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
Which is cheaper, BALLDONTLIE or Entity Sport?
BALLDONTLIE: from $9.99/mo. Entity Sport: from $150/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
Do BALLDONTLIE and Entity Sport have a free tier?
BALLDONTLIE: yes. Entity Sport: not disclosed.

More comparisons

Add a third provider to this comparison