vs
OpenLigaDB vs Enetpulse (2026)
Short answer: OpenLigaDB scores clearly higher overall (59 vs 22). Enetpulse is the better pick for media outlets, news agencies and live-score apps that want multi-sport live scores, results and lineups as GraphQL, XML or hosted widgets under a sales-led contract.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose OpenLigaDB if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Hobby projects such as prediction games, stats apps and Bundesliga widgets that need free German football fixtures and results without an API key.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Production products needing guaranteed service, deep stats or odds; it is a community-maintained fixtures and results database.
What developers say
Free, keyless community JSON API focused on German football, used in prediction models, bots, a home-automation adapter and results videos. A user praises the simple matchday endpoint and the last-change-date call that avoids refetching. Coverage beyond German leagues is thin, and it is community-maintained so errors are possible. ODbL licence applies.
Choose Enetpulse if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Media outlets, news agencies and live-score apps that want multi-sport live scores, results and lineups as GraphQL, XML or hosted widgets under a sales-led contract.
- ✓ need Tennis, Basketball, Cycling
- ✓ need live / in-play data
- ✓ need an enterprise feed with a contract and SLA-style support
Not ideal for: Developers looking for self-serve keys or published prices; access starts with a sales conversation and a test period.
What developers say
Long-running B2B live scores and results provider for 100+ sports, delivered as GraphQL, XML or widgets. Only a decade-old comment cites it as a paid live data feed option, plus a few hobby repos such as a scores clone. No hands-on user reviews of price, coverage or reliability.
Side by side
| OpenLigaDB | Enetpulse | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 59/100 (#21) | 22/100 (#166) |
| Popularity | 47 | 29 |
| Community & reliability | 70 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 75 | 20 |
| Developer experience | 51 | 12 |
| Type | Free / open data | B2B data feed |
| Starting price | Free tier | Contact sales |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer), Ice hockey | Multi-sport (40+), Football (soccer), Tennis, Basketball, Ice hockey, Cycling, Motorsport, Cricket |
| Data | Fixtures, Results, Live scores | Fixtures, Lineups, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | GraphQL, XML feed |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Not found |
| Developer discussions | 5 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 166 | 4 |
| Community tone | Mostly positive | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is OpenLigaDB or Enetpulse better?
- OpenLigaDB scores clearly higher overall (59 vs 22). Enetpulse is the better pick for media outlets, news agencies and live-score apps that want multi-sport live scores, results and lineups as GraphQL, XML or hosted widgets under a sales-led contract.
- Which is cheaper, OpenLigaDB or Enetpulse?
- OpenLigaDB: Free tier. Enetpulse: Contact sales. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do OpenLigaDB and Enetpulse have a free tier?
- OpenLigaDB: yes. Enetpulse: not disclosed.