vs
OpenFoot API vs QiuXiaoCe Football (2026)
Short answer: OpenFoot API scores clearly higher overall (49 vs 32). QiuXiaoCe Football is the better pick for Chinese-language football apps and analysts who want per-call prepaid pricing and many endpoints (lineups, injuries, advanced metrics) without a subscription.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose OpenFoot API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football developers who want a free-to-start REST API with fixtures, lineups, live events and shot-level xG, plus streams and webhooks on paid plans.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ need live / in-play data
Not ideal for: Other sports or xG outside the top five leagues; the API is football-only and still labelled beta.
What developers say
Newer football API with a free tier and low-priced paid plans. Only one thread names it, listing it at about $14 a month among cheap options for post-match stats next to Sportmonks and API-Football. A community MCP server and a couple of hobby repos use it; no hands-on reviews yet.
Choose QiuXiaoCe Football if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Chinese-language football apps and analysts who want per-call prepaid pricing and many endpoints (lineups, injuries, advanced metrics) without a subscription.
Not ideal for: Projects that need non-football data, an English interface, or high request rates; the limit is 30 requests per minute.
What developers say
No community discussion. Everything found is the vendor's own GitHub output: datasets, SDKs, a CLI, an MCP server, a VS Code extension and a GitHub Action around its Chinese-language football API. This shows tooling effort but no independent user feedback on pricing, quality or reliability.
Side by side
| OpenFoot API | QiuXiaoCe Football | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 49/100 (#60) | 32/100 (#134) |
| Popularity | 15 | 16 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 70 |
| Developer experience | 67 | 23 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from $14/mo | from ¥10 one-time |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Demo access | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Football (soccer) |
| Data | Fixtures, Lineups, Odds, Predictions, Results, Live scores, Standings, xG | Fixtures, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Predictions, Results, Standings, Team stats, xG |
| Delivery | Streaming (SSE) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST, SSE, Webhooks | REST |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 1 | 0 |
| GitHub repos | 3 | 13 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is OpenFoot API or QiuXiaoCe Football better?
- OpenFoot API scores clearly higher overall (49 vs 32). QiuXiaoCe Football is the better pick for Chinese-language football apps and analysts who want per-call prepaid pricing and many endpoints (lineups, injuries, advanced metrics) without a subscription.
- Which is cheaper, OpenFoot API or QiuXiaoCe Football?
- OpenFoot API: from $14/mo. QiuXiaoCe Football: from ¥10 one-time. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do OpenFoot API and QiuXiaoCe Football have a free tier?
- OpenFoot API: yes. QiuXiaoCe Football: no.