vs
Football Charts vs QiuXiaoCe Football (2026)
Short answer: Football Charts scores clearly higher overall (49 vs 32). QiuXiaoCe Football is the better pick for Chinese-language football apps and analysts who want per-call prepaid pricing and many endpoints (lineups, injuries, advanced metrics) without a subscription.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose Football Charts if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Football hobby and research projects needing daily results, tables, model probabilities and season projections for 98 leagues, with a free key and cheap paid tiers.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
Not ideal for: Live-score apps; data refreshes daily around 06:00 UTC. Not for redistribution, and free and Personal keys are personal use only.
What developers say
Small football results and projections API with a free keyless tier, MCP server and client libraries covering lower leagues. Every mention found comes from its own maker (a self-disclosed Reddit post, integration requests, companion repos). No independent user feedback on quality, limits or pricing exists yet.
Choose QiuXiaoCe Football if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Chinese-language football apps and analysts who want per-call prepaid pricing and many endpoints (lineups, injuries, advanced metrics) without a subscription.
Not ideal for: Projects that need non-football data, an English interface, or high request rates; the limit is 30 requests per minute.
What developers say
No community discussion. Everything found is the vendor's own GitHub output: datasets, SDKs, a CLI, an MCP server, a VS Code extension and a GitHub Action around its Chinese-language football API. This shows tooling effort but no independent user feedback on pricing, quality or reliability.
Side by side
| Football Charts | QiuXiaoCe Football | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 49/100 (#59) | 32/100 (#134) |
| Popularity | 20 | 16 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 100 | 70 |
| Developer experience | 48 | 23 |
| Type | Free / open data | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from €9/mo | from ¥10 one-time |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Football (soccer) |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Predictions, Results, Standings, Team stats | Fixtures, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Predictions, Results, Standings, Team stats, xG |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Paid plans only | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 1 | 0 |
| GitHub repos | 14 | 13 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is Football Charts or QiuXiaoCe Football better?
- Football Charts scores clearly higher overall (49 vs 32). QiuXiaoCe Football is the better pick for Chinese-language football apps and analysts who want per-call prepaid pricing and many endpoints (lineups, injuries, advanced metrics) without a subscription.
- Which is cheaper, Football Charts or QiuXiaoCe Football?
- Football Charts: from €9/mo. QiuXiaoCe Football: from ¥10 one-time. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do Football Charts and QiuXiaoCe Football have a free tier?
- Football Charts: yes. QiuXiaoCe Football: no.