vs
FastF1 vs Football Charts (2026)
Short answer: FastF1 scores clearly higher overall (58 vs 49). Football Charts is the better pick for football hobby and research projects needing daily results, tables, model probabilities and season projections for 98 leagues, with a free key and cheap paid tiers.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose FastF1 if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Python users analysing Formula 1 lap timing, telemetry, tyres and weather, such as hobbyist and research notebooks.
- ✓ need Formula 1, Motorsport
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Non-Python projects or hosted-API needs; it is a Python library, not a web service, and most data needs an F1TV subscription.
What developers say
Popular unofficial Python package giving F1 timing, telemetry and results as DataFrames; the go-to for analysis posts, student projects and dashboards, with a large GitHub following. Other projects borrow its live-timing client. Caveats: most data needs F1TV access, a network-blocking issue was reported, and beginners hit version-related errors. Often paired with Jolpica or OpenF1.
Choose Football Charts if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Football hobby and research projects needing daily results, tables, model probabilities and season projections for 98 leagues, with a free key and cheap paid tiers.
- ✓ need Football (soccer)
Not ideal for: Live-score apps; data refreshes daily around 06:00 UTC. Not for redistribution, and free and Personal keys are personal use only.
What developers say
Small football results and projections API with a free keyless tier, MCP server and client libraries covering lower leagues. Every mention found comes from its own maker (a self-disclosed Reddit post, integration requests, companion repos). No independent user feedback on quality, limits or pricing exists yet.
Side by side
| FastF1 | Football Charts | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 58/100 (#23) | 49/100 (#59) |
| Popularity | 35 | 20 |
| Community & reliability | 78 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 65 | 100 |
| Developer experience | 65 | 48 |
| Type | Free / open data | Free / open data |
| Starting price | Free tier | from €9/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Formula 1, Motorsport | Football (soccer) |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Results, Team stats, Tracking data | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Predictions, Results, Standings, Team stats |
| Delivery | SDK only | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | SDK only | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: Paid plans only |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 10 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 118 | 14 |
| Community tone | Mostly positive | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is FastF1 or Football Charts better?
- FastF1 scores clearly higher overall (58 vs 49). Football Charts is the better pick for football hobby and research projects needing daily results, tables, model probabilities and season projections for 98 leagues, with a free key and cheap paid tiers.
- Which is cheaper, FastF1 or Football Charts?
- FastF1: Free tier. Football Charts: from €9/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do FastF1 and Football Charts have a free tier?
- FastF1: yes. Football Charts: yes.