vs
FastF1 vs RacingHub (2026)
Short answer: FastF1 scores clearly higher overall (58 vs 20). RacingHub is the better pick if you need its specific coverage.
From public data checked . How we know

Choose FastF1 if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Python users analysing Formula 1 lap timing, telemetry, tyres and weather, such as hobbyist and research notebooks.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Non-Python projects or hosted-API needs; it is a Python library, not a web service, and most data needs an F1TV subscription.
What developers say
Popular unofficial Python package giving F1 timing, telemetry and results as DataFrames; the go-to for analysis posts, student projects and dashboards, with a large GitHub following. Other projects borrow its live-timing client. Caveats: most data needs F1TV access, a network-blocking issue was reported, and beginners hit version-related errors. Often paired with Jolpica or OpenF1.

Choose RacingHub if you…
Free / open data
No clear advantage in the public data; compare coverage on your own use case.
What developers say
Free open-source F1 historical data API. Only a removed launch post and a few repos; the YouTube results are an unrelated F1 explainer channel with the same name.
Side by side
| FastF1 | RacingHub | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 58/100 (#22) | 20/100 (#174) |
| Popularity | 35 | 15 |
| Community & reliability | 78 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 65 | 15 |
| Developer experience | 65 | 32 |
| Type | Free / open data | Free / open data |
| Starting price | Free tier | Price not public |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Formula 1, Motorsport | Formula 1, Motorsport |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Results, Team stats, Tracking data | Historical data, Results, Team stats |
| Delivery | SDK only | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | SDK only | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 10 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 118 | 3 |
| Community tone | Mostly positive | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is FastF1 or RacingHub better?
- FastF1 scores clearly higher overall (58 vs 20). RacingHub is the better pick if you need its specific coverage.
- Which is cheaper, FastF1 or RacingHub?
- FastF1: Free tier. RacingHub: Price not public. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do FastF1 and RacingHub have a free tier?
- FastF1: yes. RacingHub: not disclosed.