vs
Live Tennis API vs Entity Sport (2026)
Short answer: Live Tennis API scores slightly higher (56 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose Live Tennis API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Tennis apps, dashboards and models needing live point-by-point scores and history across ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF, with a permanent free tier.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ want a lower entry price ($9.99/mo vs $150/mo)
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
Not ideal for: Projects needing other sports or free odds; odds and the WebSocket feed start on paid plans.
What developers say
Tennis feed (REST and WebSocket) with point-by-point scores, odds and win probability. Most mentions are vendor-authored issues and promotions. A few independent users say they use it for tennis models or a match-simulation app and find the data detailed, but there is no real feedback on price, reliability or latency.
Choose Entity Sport if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
- ✓ need Cricket, Football (soccer), Basketball
Not ideal for: Teams wanting one flat price across sports or an open free tier; plans are priced per sport and licensed to one domain and one app.
What developers say
Cricket-first provider used in a number of hobby cricket and IPL score sites, with a community SDK on GitHub. The one user opinion says it covers part of what a developer wanted for deep cricket stats but not all. Other hits are vendor-style posts; nothing on pricing, reliability or support.
Side by side
| Live Tennis API | Entity Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 56/100 (#28) | 51/100 (#44) |
| Popularity | 38 | 27 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 85 | 100 |
| Developer experience | 60 | 43 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | from $9.99/mo | from $150/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Tennis | Cricket, Football (soccer), Basketball, Baseball, American football, Ice hockey, Tennis |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Play-by-play, Predictions, Results, Live scores, Team stats | Fantasy, Fixtures, Odds, Play-by-play, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Team stats |
| Delivery | Streaming (WebSocket) | Streaming (WebSocket) |
| Protocols | REST, WebSocket, Webhooks | REST, WebSocket |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: Paid plans only |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 8 | 3 |
| GitHub repos | 80 | 14 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is Live Tennis API or Entity Sport better?
- Live Tennis API scores slightly higher (56 vs 51). Entity Sport is the better pick for cricket apps and fantasy or exchange products that need ball-by-ball data, with priced plans also available for football, tennis and US leagues.
- Which is cheaper, Live Tennis API or Entity Sport?
- Live Tennis API: from $9.99/mo. Entity Sport: from $150/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do Live Tennis API and Entity Sport have a free tier?
- Live Tennis API: yes. Entity Sport: not disclosed.