vs
FootyStats vs iSports API (2026)
Short answer: FootyStats scores clearly higher overall (53 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose FootyStats if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football apps, stats sites and ML projects that need cards, corners, BTTS and over/under statistics across many leagues, with a free tier to test.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Projects that need sports other than football or sub-minute live updates; results refresh about every 20 minutes.
What developers say
Soccer stats API and CSV downloads covering many leagues, used by betting-model builders and scrapers for BTTS, corners and over/under data. Bettors mention it as an affordable broad source, but several say data has gaps, odd or inconsistent numbers and weaker xG than FBref-style sources. Used with other feeds for odds.
Choose iSports API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- ✓ need Basketball
- ✓ need live / in-play data
Not ideal for: Projects needing other sports; the product pages cover football and basketball only.
What developers say
Asian football and basketball data API with livescore, odds and history. Evidence is thin: a few beginner questions and hobby repos use it, and a competitor's spam posts claim its mid-tier plans cost about double. No substantive independent reviews of quality, latency or support.
Side by side
| FootyStats | iSports API | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 53/100 (#35) | 45/100 (#83) |
| Popularity | 52 | 35 |
| Community & reliability | 50 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 60 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 50 | 32 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | Free tier | from $49/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Football (soccer), Basketball |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Player stats, Results, Standings, Team stats | Fixtures, Historical data, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 6 | 4 |
| GitHub repos | 95 | 7 |
| Community tone | Mixed | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is FootyStats or iSports API better?
- FootyStats scores clearly higher overall (53 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- Which is cheaper, FootyStats or iSports API?
- FootyStats: Free tier. iSports API: from $49/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do FootyStats and iSports API have a free tier?
- FootyStats: yes. iSports API: no.