vs
FootyStats vs AcesAPI (2026)
Short answer: FootyStats scores slightly higher (53 vs 48). AcesAPI is the better pick for tennis apps and models that need ATP and WTA matches, rankings, Elo ratings, head-to-head and surface splits, with a free tier to start.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose FootyStats if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football apps, stats sites and ML projects that need cards, corners, BTTS and over/under statistics across many leagues, with a free tier to test.
- ✓ need Football (soccer)
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Projects that need sports other than football or sub-minute live updates; results refresh about every 20 minutes.
What developers say
Soccer stats API and CSV downloads covering many leagues, used by betting-model builders and scrapers for BTTS, corners and over/under data. Bettors mention it as an affordable broad source, but several say data has gaps, odd or inconsistent numbers and weaker xG than FBref-style sources. Used with other feeds for odds.
Choose AcesAPI if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Tennis apps and models that need ATP and WTA matches, rankings, Elo ratings, head-to-head and surface splits, with a free tier to start.
- ✓ need Tennis
- ✓ need commercial use allowed in the public terms
Not ideal for: Projects covering other sports, or ones that need to resell raw odds in bulk; the terms disallow redistribution.
What developers say
Tennis API offered over REST and a hosted MCP server. Evidence is limited to the vendor's own MCP directory submissions and repos plus an API-profile listing. No independent user feedback on accuracy, price or reliability was found.
Side by side
| FootyStats | AcesAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 53/100 (#35) | 48/100 (#63) |
| Popularity | 52 | 11 |
| Community & reliability | 50 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 60 | 100 |
| Developer experience | 50 | 61 |
| Type | Sports data API | Sports data API |
| Starting price | Free tier | from $19/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Tennis |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Player stats, Results, Standings, Team stats | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Player stats, Results, Standings, Team stats |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: Allowed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 6 | 0 |
| GitHub repos | 95 | 2 |
| Community tone | Mixed | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is FootyStats or AcesAPI better?
- FootyStats scores slightly higher (53 vs 48). AcesAPI is the better pick for tennis apps and models that need ATP and WTA matches, rankings, Elo ratings, head-to-head and surface splits, with a free tier to start.
- Which is cheaper, FootyStats or AcesAPI?
- FootyStats: Free tier. AcesAPI: from $19/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do FootyStats and AcesAPI have a free tier?
- FootyStats: yes. AcesAPI: yes.