Jolpica-F1 vs StatPal (2026)
Short answer: Jolpica-F1 scores slightly higher (50 vs 43). StatPal is the better pick for Scoreboards, betting tools and fantasy apps that need live scores and odds across many sports and 1,000+ soccer leagues at flat monthly prices, with a 14-day trial.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose Jolpica-F1 if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Formula 1 projects, especially ones migrating from the retired Ergast API, that need free historical results and standings.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
Not ideal for: Commercial products needing guarantees: it is volunteer-run, rate-limited and the licence does not address the data.
What developers say
Free, volunteer-run Formula 1 API that took over from the retired Ergast service with compatible endpoints. Widely adopted: roughly thirty GitHub repos, popular F1 data-visualisation posts, and projects that integrate it for historical results and standings. Little explicit praise or criticism in discussion; no pricing or reliability complaints surfaced.
Choose StatPal if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Scoreboards, betting tools and fantasy apps that need live scores and odds across many sports and 1,000+ soccer leagues at flat monthly prices, with a 14-day trial.
- ✓ need Football (soccer), American football, Basketball
- ✓ need live / in-play data
Not ideal for: Free-tier projects; there is no free plan. Usage rights for revenue-generating products are unclear in the terms.
What developers say
Sports API with flat monthly plans and a soccer xG feature. One bettor tried it as an xG source claimed to rival Sportmonks. A sports project's issues report endpoints (teams, injuries, rosters) returning 404 and soccer livescores being routed to the wrong API version, suggesting integration pitfalls or version changes. Little else known.
Side by side
| Jolpica-F1 | StatPal | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 50/100 (#52) | 43/100 (#99) |
| Popularity | 33 | 7 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 75 | 85 |
| Developer experience | 53 | 65 |
| Type | Free / open data | Sports data API |
| Starting price | Free tier | from $29/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Not stated | 14 days |
| Sports | Formula 1, Motorsport | Football (soccer), American football, Basketball, Baseball, Ice hockey, Formula 1, Motorsport, Golf |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Results, Standings, Team stats | Fixtures, Historical data, Lineups, News, Odds, Predictions, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 2 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 1.6k | 0 |
| Community tone | Neutral | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is Jolpica-F1 or StatPal better?
- Jolpica-F1 scores slightly higher (50 vs 43). StatPal is the better pick for Scoreboards, betting tools and fantasy apps that need live scores and odds across many sports and 1,000+ soccer leagues at flat monthly prices, with a 14-day trial.
- Which is cheaper, Jolpica-F1 or StatPal?
- Jolpica-F1: Free tier. StatPal: from $29/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do Jolpica-F1 and StatPal have a free tier?
- Jolpica-F1: yes. StatPal: no.