vsCollegeBasketballData.com vs Jolpica-F1 (2026)
Short answer: The two score about the same (51 vs 50). Jolpica-F1 is the better pick for Formula 1 projects, especially ones migrating from the retired Ergast API, that need free historical results and standings.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose CollegeBasketballData.com if you…
Free / open data
Best for: College basketball analysts and developers who want a free personal API key, CSV exports and historical data, with commercial use allowed.
- ✓ need Basketball, College sports
- ✓ need commercial use allowed in the public terms
Not ideal for: Projects needing odds, live scores or sports other than college basketball and football; redistribution of the data is not allowed.
What developers say
College basketball API from the CFBD team with a free personal key and official Python and R clients. A community Node wrapper exists, and one betting-model video holds it up as a clean, cheap alternative to maintaining scrapers. Little other independent discussion, so detailed quality or limit feedback is missing.
Choose Jolpica-F1 if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Formula 1 projects, especially ones migrating from the retired Ergast API, that need free historical results and standings.
- ✓ need Formula 1, Motorsport
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
Not ideal for: Commercial products needing guarantees: it is volunteer-run, rate-limited and the licence does not address the data.
What developers say
Free, volunteer-run Formula 1 API that took over from the retired Ergast service with compatible endpoints. Widely adopted: roughly thirty GitHub repos, popular F1 data-visualisation posts, and projects that integrate it for historical results and standings. Little explicit praise or criticism in discussion; no pricing or reliability complaints surfaced.
Side by side
| CollegeBasketballData.com | Jolpica-F1 | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 51/100 (#45) | 50/100 (#52) |
| Popularity | 21 | 33 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 64 | 53 |
| Type | Free / open data | Free / open data |
| Starting price | from $1/mo | Free tier |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Basketball, College sports | Formula 1, Motorsport |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Player stats, Results, Standings, Team stats | Fixtures, Historical data, Results, Standings, Team stats |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST, CSV download | REST |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Allowed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 1 | 2 |
| GitHub repos | 42 | 1.6k |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Neutral |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is CollegeBasketballData.com or Jolpica-F1 better?
- The two score about the same (51 vs 50). Jolpica-F1 is the better pick for Formula 1 projects, especially ones migrating from the retired Ergast API, that need free historical results and standings.
- Which is cheaper, CollegeBasketballData.com or Jolpica-F1?
- CollegeBasketballData.com: from $1/mo. Jolpica-F1: Free tier. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do CollegeBasketballData.com and Jolpica-F1 have a free tier?
- CollegeBasketballData.com: yes. Jolpica-F1: yes.