vs
ScoreBat Video API vs Sportradar (2026)
Short answer: ScoreBat Video API scores slightly higher (54 vs 51). Sportradar is the better pick for sportsbooks, media companies and leagues that need official multi-sport live data, odds feeds and trading services under a sales contract.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose ScoreBat Video API if you…
Video
Best for: Football sites and apps that want to embed match highlight and live-stream videos by competition or team, with a limited free feed for testing.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
Not ideal for: Projects needing scores, stats or odds data; it only serves video embeds, and full competition feeds are paid.
What developers say
Appears to be a free JSON feed of football highlight videos (Scorebat-style), announced in 2019 posts and used by a few small web apps. No user opinions about reliability, licensing or quality in the digest.
Choose Sportradar if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Sportsbooks, media companies and leagues that need official multi-sport live data, odds feeds and trading services under a sales contract.
- ✓ need live / in-play data
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
- ✓ need an enterprise feed with a contract and SLA-style support
Not ideal for: Hobby projects or buyers who need public, self-serve pricing; production pricing is by request volume through sales.
What developers say
Seen as the benchmark enterprise sports data supplier, used via trial keys in hobby projects, wrappers and tutorials. Developers repeatedly call it too expensive (thousands per month), opaque on pricing, sometimes unwilling to sell to small buyers, and not fast enough for live use. Common cheaper alternatives mentioned: SportsDataIO, Genius, Opta, Sportmonks.
Side by side
| ScoreBat Video API | Sportradar | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 54/100 (#32) | 51/100 (#43) |
| Popularity | 32 | 69 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | 52 |
| Transparency | 85 | 35 |
| Developer experience | 60 | 36 |
| Type | Video | B2B data feed |
| Starting price | from $69/mo | Price not public |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Multi-sport (40+) |
| Data | Video, Widgets | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Play-by-play, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Video, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Streaming (Push feed) |
| Protocols | REST | REST, Push feed, XML feed |
| Live / in-play | No | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 3 | 33 |
| GitHub repos | 68 | 237 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Mixed |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is ScoreBat Video API or Sportradar better?
- ScoreBat Video API scores slightly higher (54 vs 51). Sportradar is the better pick for sportsbooks, media companies and leagues that need official multi-sport live data, odds feeds and trading services under a sales contract.
- Which is cheaper, ScoreBat Video API or Sportradar?
- ScoreBat Video API: from $69/mo. Sportradar: Price not public. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do ScoreBat Video API and Sportradar have a free tier?
- ScoreBat Video API: yes. Sportradar: not disclosed.