vs
ScoreBat Video API vs FeedConstruct (2026)
Short answer: ScoreBat Video API scores clearly higher overall (54 vs 10). FeedConstruct is the better pick for sportsbook operators that want a managed odds feed, live scouting data, widgets and video across 120+ sports and esports from a B2B supplier.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose ScoreBat Video API if you…
Video
Best for: Football sites and apps that want to embed match highlight and live-stream videos by competition or team, with a limited free feed for testing.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ prefer public, self-serve pricing over a sales call
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
Not ideal for: Projects needing scores, stats or odds data; it only serves video embeds, and full competition feeds are paid.
What developers say
Appears to be a free JSON feed of football highlight videos (Scorebat-style), announced in 2019 posts and used by a few small web apps. No user opinions about reliability, licensing or quality in the digest.
Choose FeedConstruct if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Sportsbook operators that want a managed odds feed, live scouting data, widgets and video across 120+ sports and esports from a B2B supplier.
- ✓ need Esports
- ✓ need an enterprise feed with a contract and SLA-style support
Not ideal for: Independent developers or small apps; pricing and API docs are not public and products are arranged through sales.
What developers say
B2B odds feed and scouting data supplier for sportsbook operators. Only its own promotional video and a reseller video listing it beside Sportradar, OpticOdds and Sportmonks were found. No developer or customer opinion on price, latency or quality, so nothing is known.
Side by side
| ScoreBat Video API | FeedConstruct | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 54/100 (#32) | 10/100 (#211) |
| Popularity | 32 | 16 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 85 | 10 |
| Developer experience | 60 | 0 |
| Type | Video | B2B data feed |
| Starting price | from $69/mo | Contact sales |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Multi-sport (40+), Esports |
| Data | Video, Widgets | Odds, Live scores, Team stats, Video, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Not disclosed |
| Protocols | REST | Not disclosed |
| Live / in-play | No | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Not found |
| Developer discussions | 3 | 0 |
| GitHub repos | 68 | 0 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is ScoreBat Video API or FeedConstruct better?
- ScoreBat Video API scores clearly higher overall (54 vs 10). FeedConstruct is the better pick for sportsbook operators that want a managed odds feed, live scouting data, widgets and video across 120+ sports and esports from a B2B supplier.
- Which is cheaper, ScoreBat Video API or FeedConstruct?
- ScoreBat Video API: from $69/mo. FeedConstruct: Contact sales. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do ScoreBat Video API and FeedConstruct have a free tier?
- ScoreBat Video API: yes. FeedConstruct: not disclosed.