Tracking
Catapult
Wearable GPS/LPS athlete monitoring and video analysis for teams. Clients can pull their own tracked data through OpenField API tokens and Catapult Connect integrations. Pricing by request.
Facts verified against the provider's site on
Tone of public discussions, liked vs criticised points, reliability complaints; not enough public discussion to judge.
Computed from public data only; uptime and latency are not measured yet. Enterprise feeds that sell by contract score lower on transparency by design. How the score works
- Starting price
- Contact sales
- Free access
- Not disclosed
- Sports
- 1 (Multi-sport (40+))
- Live data
- Not disclosed
- Delivery
- Polling only (REST)
- Discussions
- 0 threads
- GitHub adoption
- 6 repos
Best for
Sports teams that use Catapult wearables and want to pull their own tracked athlete data through API tokens.
Not ideal for
Developers seeking a public sports data feed: this is client performance data with no public API docs or pricing.
Limitations to check
- − Pricing is by request only
- − No public API documentation found
- − Terms page held no readable text
Written from the provider's own pages (source).
Last checked 2026-11-03
Catapult at a glance
- What is Catapult best for?
- Sports teams that use Catapult wearables and want to pull their own tracked athlete data through API tokens. Not ideal for: Developers seeking a public sports data feed: this is client performance data with no public API docs or pricing.
- How much does Catapult cost?
- Catapult has no public price list: pricing is quoted by sales on request.
- Does Catapult have a free tier?
- Catapult does not say whether a free tier exists. Check https://www.catapult.com/pricing.
- What does Catapult cover?
- Catapult is a tracking. Its sports: Multi-sport (40+); data: Team stats, Tracking data, Video.
- Does Catapult have a WebSocket or streaming API?
- No streaming is listed. Catapult delivers data by REST, so you poll for updates.
- What do developers say about Catapult?
- Almost no real discussion of Catapult's sports-tech API; the name collides with Chrome tracing tools, a blockchain, a Microsoft research project and other products. Only a couple of items touch it: a backend repo built on the Catapult API database and a third-party integrator video. Nothing on pricing, quality or reliability is known.
- What are the alternatives to Catapult?
- Close alternatives in the SportDex catalog: Sportlogiq, Hawk-Eye Innovations, Kitman Labs, SkillCorner, KINEXON Sports.
Commercial decision
Pricing & plan limits
| Plan | Price | Requests | What's included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team pricing | Contact sales | — | Request pricing via form (Vector Pro, Vector Core, Catapult One etc.)source |
Low certainty: client-performance data, not a public sports data feed. No public API docs found; API token mentioned in a third-party Smartabase help article. Owns Impect (see impect). Protocol/format assumed REST/JSON.
Before choosing a paid plan, confirm
• What counts as one request (per call, per market, per region?)
• What happens when you exceed the quota: blocked or billed
• Whether live and historical data are on your plan
• Whether your use (public app, betting, resale) is licensed
The critical question
Data coverage
- Sports
- Multi-sport (40+)
- Data types
- Team statsTracking dataVideo
- Key competitions
- Not disclosed
- Competitions
- Not disclosed
- Live / in-play
- Not disclosed
- Women's competitions
- Not disclosed
- Betting markets
- Not disclosed
- Bookmaker regions
- Not disclosed
- Bookmakers
- Not disclosed
- History depth
- Not disclosed
- Update frequency
- Not disclosed
- Name languages
- Not disclosed
- ID mapping
- Not disclosed
Coverage often depends on the plan; confirm the exact league and season on your plan.
Before you build
Usage rights & access
Rights are set in an individual contract; the public terms only cover the website.
- Commercial use
- Not disclosed
- Betting products
- Not disclosed
- Redistribution
- Not disclosed
- Storing data
- Not disclosed
- Attribution
- Not disclosed
- Logos & photos
- Not disclosed
- Who can buy
- Not disclosed
- Verification (KYC)
- Not disclosed
- Not available in
- Not disclosed
- Only available in
- Not disclosed
Developer-ready evaluation
Integration & documentation
- Protocols
- REST
- Formats
- JSON
- Authentication
- api key
- SDKs
- Not disclosed
- OpenAPI spec
- Not disclosed
- Claimed latency
- Not disclosed
- Status page
- Not disclosed
- Sandbox / test keys
- Not disclosed
- Support
- Not disclosed
- SLA uptime
- Not disclosed
Preview brief
# Integration brief: Catapult Goal: build a feature on Catapult data. Use only the official documentation below as the source of truth. ## Known facts (from SportDex, verify before relying on them) - Website: https://www.catapult.com - Docs: UNKNOWN — find the developer docs first - Sports: Multi-sport (40+) - Data: Team stats, Tracking data, Video - Protocols: REST; formats: json - Auth: api_key - Free plan: none listed - Note: Low certainty: client-performance data, not a public sports data feed. No public API docs found; API token mentioned in a third-party Smartabase help article. Owns Impect (see impect). Protocol/format assumed REST/JSON. ## Verify before writing code - live update frequency - whether commercial use is allowed on the plan you pick - exact endpoint paths, parameters and response fields (read the official docs, do not guess) ## Implementation rules - Keep the API key on the server (environment variable, backend route or edge function); never ship it to the browser. - Cache responses and respect rate limits; count how many requests each screen triggers. - Handle errors explicitly: invalid key, quota exceeded (429), missing fields, empty fixtures, timeouts. - Start with one demo request and log the raw response before building UI on assumed field names.
Data quality signals
Data source & company
- Official partners
- Not disclosed
- How data is collected
- Not disclosed
- Certifications
- Not disclosed
- Payment methods
- Not disclosed
- Minimum contract
- Not disclosed
- Country
- Not disclosed
- Founded
- Not disclosed
Reddit · Hacker News · Stack Overflow · GitHub · YouTube
What developers say
Almost no real discussion of Catapult's sports-tech API; the name collides with Chrome tracing tools, a blockchain, a Microsoft research project and other products. Only a couple of items touch it: a backend repo built on the Catapult API database and a third-party integrator video. Nothing on pricing, quality or reliability is known.
Our summary of public discussions, not a rating. Vendor posts are not counted as user opinion.
Open-source projects using it
Videos
- Catapult API - Just Play FootballJust Play Football · 2024-12
Shortlist next steps
Alternatives worth comparing

Computer-vision hockey, soccer and football analytics supplying tracking and event data, insights and video tools to teams, leagues and media. Acquired by Teamworks.
Ice hockeyFootball (soccer)American footballContact sales0 discussions · 7 repos
Sports technology company with optical ball and player tracking, officiating and replay, supplying tracking data and insights to leagues, federations and broadcasters across 25 sports.
Multi-sport (40+)Football (soccer)Tennis+2Contact sales0 discussions · 2 repos
Athlete performance and medical platform; an API add-on gives clients structured access to their iP data for external systems. League operations endpoints cover schedules and fixtures. Enterprise only.
Multi-sport (40+)Contact sales0 discussions · 0 repos
Computer-vision provider turning broadcast or tactical camera video into player and ball tracking plus event data for football, basketball and American football, delivered to clubs and leagues.
Free tierFootball (soccer)BasketballAmerican footballFree tier0 discussions · 10 repos
Sports tracking and analytics provider (local positioning, IMU, GPS) for teams, leagues and federations, with products for performance monitoring, fan engagement and officiating.
Football (soccer)BasketballHandball+3Contact sales0 discussions · 1 repos
Evidence & transparency
Official sources
Facts were extracted from the provider's own pages on 2026-11-03. Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing. How we know