Skip to content
sportdex.

Betting exchange · United Kingdom

BETDAQ

UK betting exchange whose webservice API is open to verified account holders for a one-off fee, and which offers a streaming commercial API to operators.

Facts verified against the provider's site on

Commercial use: not disclosedBetting use: not disclosedToo little discussion
29

SportDex Score

#146 of 233 sports APIs

See the full ranking →
21

Brand demand, developer discussions, GitHub repos and videos

—

Tone of public discussions, liked vs criticised points, reliability complaints; not enough public discussion to judge.

50

Public prices, docs, terms and coverage you can check before calling sales

22

Free access, docs, SDKs, OpenAPI, sandbox, realtime delivery, ecosystem

Computed from public data only; uptime and latency are not measured yet. Enterprise feeds that sell by contract score lower on transparency by design. How the score works

Starting price
£250 one-time
Free access
Not disclosed
Sports
1 (Multi-sport (40+))
Live data
Not disclosed
Delivery
Not disclosed
Discussions
8 threads
GitHub adoption
3 repos

Best for

Not enough public detail to say.

Programmatic trading on a betting exchangeExchange odds retrieval

Not ideal for

Nothing stated on its pages.

Limitations to check

  • − API access needs a verified account and application, with a one-off fee reported (250 GBP, date unknown)
  • − Commercial streaming access is by contact
  • − No pages were saved to check terms

Written from the provider's own pages (source).

Last checked 2026-11-03

BETDAQ at a glance

How much does BETDAQ cost?
The cheapest public paid plan of BETDAQ is £250 one-time.
Does BETDAQ have a free tier?
BETDAQ does not say whether a free tier exists. Check https://www.betdaq.com.
What does BETDAQ cover?
BETDAQ is a betting exchange. Its sports: Multi-sport (40+); data: Trading & risk, Odds.
What do developers say about BETDAQ?
UK betting exchange with an account-holder API used by a few older Python wrappers. Recent chatter treats it as a minor option next to Betfair and Matchbook, with notably lower liquidity, and aggregators list its lay prices. There is little hands-on feedback on API quality, so little is known beyond liquidity worries.
What are the alternatives to BETDAQ?
Close alternatives in the SportDex catalog: Matchbook Exchange, Polymarket, Smarkets, SX Bet, Betfair Exchange API.

Commercial decision

Pricing & plan limits

PlanPriceRequestsWhat's included
Individual API access£250 one-time—One-off access fee per help article; verified account and application form needed (article date unknown)source
Commercial / streamingContact sales—Contact BETDAQ; application requiredsource

Site blocked crawler; from search snippets. Protocol unspecified (described only as webservice methods). Fee may be outdated; auth is username/password, listed as api_key approximation.

Before choosing a paid plan, confirm

• What counts as one request (per call, per market, per region?)

• What happens when you exceed the quota: blocked or billed

• Whether live and historical data are on your plan

• Whether your use (public app, betting, resale) is licensed

The critical question

Data coverage

Sports
Multi-sport (40+)
Data types
Trading & riskOdds
Key competitions
Not disclosed
Competitions
Not disclosed
Live / in-play
Not disclosed
Women's competitions
Not disclosed
Betting markets
Not disclosed
Bookmaker regions
Not disclosed
Bookmakers
Not disclosed
History depth
Not disclosed
Update frequency
Not disclosed
Name languages
Not disclosed
ID mapping
Not disclosed

Coverage often depends on the plan; confirm the exact league and season on your plan.

Before you build

Usage rights & access

Commercial use
Not disclosed
Betting products
Not disclosed
Redistribution
Not disclosed
Storing data
Not disclosed
Attribution
Not disclosed
Logos & photos
Not disclosed
Who can buy
Not disclosed
Verification (KYC)
Not disclosed
Not available in
Not disclosed
Only available in
Not disclosed

Developer-ready evaluation

Integration & documentation

Protocols
Formats
Not disclosed
Authentication
api key
SDKs
Not disclosed
OpenAPI spec
Not disclosed
Claimed latency
Not disclosed
Status page
Not disclosed
Sandbox / test keys
Not disclosed
Support
Not disclosed
SLA uptime
Not disclosed
Preview brief
# Integration brief: BETDAQ

Goal: build a feature on BETDAQ data. Use only the official documentation below as the source of truth.

## Known facts (from SportDex, verify before relying on them)
- Website: https://www.betdaq.com
- Docs: https://betdaq.zendesk.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360020067139-API-access
- Sports: Multi-sport (40+)
- Data: Trading & risk, Odds
- Protocols: UNKNOWN — check the docs; formats: UNKNOWN — check the docs
- Auth: api_key
- Free plan: none listed
- Cheapest paid plan: £250 one-time
- Note: Site blocked crawler; from search snippets. Protocol unspecified (described only as webservice methods). Fee may be outdated; auth is username/password, listed as api_key approximation.

## Verify before writing code
- live update frequency
- whether commercial use is allowed on the plan you pick
- exact endpoint paths, parameters and response fields (read the official docs, do not guess)

## Implementation rules
- Keep the API key on the server (environment variable, backend route or edge function); never ship it to the browser.
- Cache responses and respect rate limits; count how many requests each screen triggers.
- Handle errors explicitly: invalid key, quota exceeded (429), missing fields, empty fixtures, timeouts.
- Start with one demo request and log the raw response before building UI on assumed field names.

Data quality signals

Data source & company

Official partners
Not disclosed
How data is collected
Not disclosed
Certifications
Not disclosed
Payment methods
Not disclosed
Minimum contract
Not disclosed
Country
United Kingdom
Founded
Not disclosed

Reddit · Hacker News · Stack Overflow · GitHub · YouTube

What developers say

Too little discussioncoveragealternatives

UK betting exchange with an account-holder API used by a few older Python wrappers. Recent chatter treats it as a minor option next to Betfair and Matchbook, with notably lower liquidity, and aggregators list its lay prices. There is little hands-on feedback on API quality, so little is known beyond liquidity worries.

Praised for

  • Exchange API available to verified account holders

Complaints

  • Much lower liquidity than Betfair

Our summary of public discussions, not a rating. Vendor posts are not counted as user opinion.

Open-source projects using it

Videos

Shortlist next steps

Alternatives worth comparing

  • Matchbook ExchangeBetting exchange30

    UK betting exchange offering a REST API for markets, offers and account data; read-only market data reportedly works without login, trading needs a funded account.

    Multi-sport (40+)
    Price not public0 discussions · 17 repos
  • PolymarketBetting exchange67

    Prediction market exchange whose public Gamma API lists markets and events, including sports, without credentials; separate trading APIs and SDKs exist.

    Free tierMulti-sport (40+)
    Free tier52 discussions · 4.5k repos
  • SmarketsBetting exchange31

    UK person-to-person betting exchange offering a streaming trading API for order entry and market data, with an official Python client.

    ⚡ StreamingMulti-sport (40+)Football (soccer)Horse racing
    Price not public4 discussions · 38 repos
  • SX BetBetting exchange51

    Peer-to-peer crypto sports betting exchange with a public REST API for markets and orders and a realtime WebSocket feed for order books, scores and line updates.

    Free tier⚡ StreamingMulti-sport (40+)
    Free tier4 discussions · 77 repos
  • Betfair Exchange APIBetting exchange60

    Betfair's developer API for its betting exchange: market prices, order books and bet placement. Free delayed key for development; live key needs an approved application and a one-off fee.

    Free tier
    from £299 one-time30 discussions · 272 repos

Evidence & transparency

Official sources

Facts were extracted from the provider's own pages on 2026-11-03. Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing. How we know