vs
PinnWire vs OpticOdds (2026)
Short answer: The two score about the same (50 vs 49). OpticOdds is the better pick for sportsbooks, odds apps and media that need real-time and historical odds from many bookmakers and are fine with a licensed, quote-based deal.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose PinnWire if you…
Odds API
Best for: Bettors and tool builders who want Pinnacle-attributed odds with SSE price-drop alerts and an optional WebSocket.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ prefer public, self-serve pricing over a sales call
- ✓ need live / in-play data
- ✓ want WebSocket push instead of polling
Not ideal for: Projects that need odds from several bookmakers; only Pinnacle-attributed prices are offered, relayed independently.
What developers say
Pinnacle-sourced odds API pitched as a replacement after Pinnacle shut its public API. All discussion is vendor-authored (a Reddit post and a video claiming very low latency and a flat monthly price); a few list and dashboard repos mention it. No independent verification.
Choose OpticOdds if you…
Odds API
Best for: Sportsbooks, odds apps and media that need real-time and historical odds from many bookmakers and are fine with a licensed, quote-based deal.
- ✓ need Football (soccer), American football, Basketball
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Hobbyists or small projects wanting self-serve public pricing; prices are not published and access is by license request.
What developers say
Enterprise odds feed from 200+ sportsbooks. One long-time client likes the broad book coverage and simple API, while others who looked at it for Pinnacle or arbitrage feeds found it solid but too expensive. Compared with The Odds API and OddsPapi; a betting YouTuber used it to pull historical closing lines.
Side by side
| PinnWire | OpticOdds | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 50/100 (#49) | 49/100 (#55) |
| Popularity | 18 | 42 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | 54 |
| Transparency | 75 | 60 |
| Developer experience | 82 | 42 |
| Type | Odds API | Odds API |
| Starting price | from $89/mo | Contact sales |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Not disclosed | Football (soccer), American football, Basketball, Tennis, Cricket, Baseball, Ice hockey, Golf, Motorsport, Esports |
| Data | Odds, Player props | Trading & risk, Historical data, Odds, Player props, Results, Live scores |
| Delivery | Streaming (WebSocket, SSE) | Streaming (SSE, Push feed) |
| Protocols | REST, WebSocket, SSE | REST, SSE, Push feed |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: Licence required |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 1 | 3 |
| GitHub repos | 5 | 7 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Mixed |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is PinnWire or OpticOdds better?
- The two score about the same (50 vs 49). OpticOdds is the better pick for sportsbooks, odds apps and media that need real-time and historical odds from many bookmakers and are fine with a licensed, quote-based deal.
- Which is cheaper, PinnWire or OpticOdds?
- PinnWire: from $89/mo. OpticOdds: Contact sales. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do PinnWire and OpticOdds have a free tier?
- PinnWire: yes. OpticOdds: not disclosed.