openfootball vs snooker.org API (2026)
Short answer: openfootball scores clearly higher overall (53 vs 41). snooker.org API is the better pick for Snooker apps and sites that need professional results, schedules, live scores, rankings and player data.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose openfootball if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Football projects that want public-domain fixtures and results as plain-text or JSON files with no key and no usage limits.
- ✓ need Football (soccer)
- ✓ need commercial use allowed in the public terms
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
Not ideal for: Apps needing live scores, detailed player stats or a hosted API; data is fetched from GitHub repositories and is not live.
What developers say
Free public-domain (CC0) football fixtures and results published as plain text and JSON files on GitHub, with no key needed. Developers use it for World Cup apps, prediction models and tutorials. Limits: static files rather than a live API, and Hacker News commenters debated whether its plain-text format is easy to parse.
Choose snooker.org API if you…
Free / open data
Best for: Snooker apps and sites that need professional results, schedules, live scores, rankings and player data.
- ✓ need Snooker
- ✓ need live / in-play data
Not ideal for: Other sports; coverage is professional snooker only.
What developers say
Free snooker data API, licensed for non-commercial use with attribution. Found in a handful of small wrappers, calendar apps and CLI tools, plus a dataset-catalogue entry noting frame scores for the main tour. One project asked for caching to cut requests. No real user opinions on quality or reliability.
Side by side
| openfootball | snooker.org API | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 53/100 (#41) | 41/100 (#110) |
| Popularity | 36 | 18 |
| Community & reliability | 52 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 48 | 49 |
| Type | Free / open data | Free / open data |
| Starting price | Free tier | Free tier |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Football (soccer) | Snooker |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Results, Standings | Fixtures, Historical data, Results, Live scores, Standings |
| Delivery | Not disclosed | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | Not disclosed | REST |
| Live / in-play | No | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Allowed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 13 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 17 | 31 |
| Community tone | Neutral | Neutral |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is openfootball or snooker.org API better?
- openfootball scores clearly higher overall (53 vs 41). snooker.org API is the better pick for Snooker apps and sites that need professional results, schedules, live scores, rankings and player data.
- Which is cheaper, openfootball or snooker.org API?
- openfootball: Free tier. snooker.org API: Free tier. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do openfootball and snooker.org API have a free tier?
- openfootball: yes. snooker.org API: yes.