vs
SharpAPI vs Lumify (2026)
Short answer: SharpAPI scores slightly higher (60 vs 54). Lumify is the better pick for developers and AI-agent builders who want odds, betting splits and scores for US sports and soccer on credit-based billing, with a free credit allotment and a trial key.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose SharpAPI if you…
Odds API
Best for: Bettors and tool builders who need real-time odds from US sportsbooks with built-in +EV, arbitrage and line-shopping endpoints.
- ✓ need live / in-play data
- ✓ want WebSocket push instead of polling
- ✓ build a betting product and need that allowed in the public terms
Not ideal for: Projects that need non-US books, full historical odds, or odds resold as a standalone product; terms ban resale and standalone odds comparison.
What developers say
Real-time sports odds API for US sportsbooks with +EV and arbitrage endpoints, launched in 2026 with a free beta tier. Material is mostly the founder's own launch posts plus one user using it for an arb tool and praising its sharp-book coverage versus The Odds API. Repos are few; sample data, R client and MCP server exist.
Choose Lumify if you…
Odds API
Best for: Developers and AI-agent builders who want odds, betting splits and scores for US sports and soccer on credit-based billing, with a free credit allotment and a trial key.
- ✓ need College sports, Tennis
Not ideal for: Anyone planning to resell the data, build bulk datasets or train models on it, all of which the terms ban.
What developers say
Newly launched sports intelligence API with an MCP server, aimed at AI agents (odds, betting splits, bet analysis). All material found is the vendor's own Show HN post and catalog submissions; no independent user opinions on pricing, quality or reliability exist yet.
Side by side
| SharpAPI | Lumify | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 60/100 (#17) | 54/100 (#32) |
| Popularity | 36 | 19 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 100 |
| Developer experience | 73 | 68 |
| Type | Odds API | Odds API |
| Starting price | from $79/mo | from $5 /usage |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | 3 days | Demo access |
| Sports | American football, Basketball, Baseball, Ice hockey, Football (soccer) | American football, College sports, Basketball, Ice hockey, Baseball, Football (soccer), Tennis |
| Data | Odds, Player props, Live scores | Fixtures, Odds, Player props, Predictions, Live scores, Team stats |
| Delivery | Streaming (SSE, WebSocket) | Streaming (SSE) |
| Protocols | REST, SSE, WebSocket | REST, SSE |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Allowed | Commercial: Allowed |
| Betting products | Betting: Allowed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 3 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 14 | 12 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is SharpAPI or Lumify better?
- SharpAPI scores slightly higher (60 vs 54). Lumify is the better pick for developers and AI-agent builders who want odds, betting splits and scores for US sports and soccer on credit-based billing, with a free credit allotment and a trial key.
- Which is cheaper, SharpAPI or Lumify?
- SharpAPI: from $79/mo. Lumify: from $5 /usage. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do SharpAPI and Lumify have a free tier?
- SharpAPI: yes. Lumify: yes.