vs
Sportradar vs iSports API (2026)
Short answer: Sportradar scores slightly higher (51 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose Sportradar if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Sportsbooks, media companies and leagues that need official multi-sport live data, odds feeds and trading services under a sales contract.
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
- ✓ need an enterprise feed with a contract and SLA-style support
Not ideal for: Hobby projects or buyers who need public, self-serve pricing; production pricing is by request volume through sales.
What developers say
Seen as the benchmark enterprise sports data supplier, used via trial keys in hobby projects, wrappers and tutorials. Developers repeatedly call it too expensive (thousands per month), opaque on pricing, sometimes unwilling to sell to small buyers, and not fast enough for live use. Common cheaper alternatives mentioned: SportsDataIO, Genius, Opta, Sportmonks.
Choose iSports API if you…
Sports data API
Best for: Football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
Not ideal for: Projects needing other sports; the product pages cover football and basketball only.
What developers say
Asian football and basketball data API with livescore, odds and history. Evidence is thin: a few beginner questions and hobby repos use it, and a competitor's spam posts claim its mid-tier plans cost about double. No substantive independent reviews of quality, latency or support.
Side by side
| Sportradar | iSports API | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 51/100 (#43) | 45/100 (#86) |
| Popularity | 69 | 35 |
| Community & reliability | 52 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 35 | 75 |
| Developer experience | 36 | 32 |
| Type | B2B data feed | Sports data API |
| Starting price | Price not public | from $49/mo |
| Free tier | Not disclosed | No |
| Free trial | Not stated | Demo access |
| Sports | Multi-sport (40+) | Football (soccer), Basketball |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Play-by-play, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Video, Widgets | Fixtures, Historical data, Injuries, Lineups, Odds, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Streaming (Push feed) | Polling only (REST) |
| Protocols | REST, Push feed, XML feed | REST |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 33 | 4 |
| GitHub repos | 237 | 7 |
| Community tone | Mixed | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is Sportradar or iSports API better?
- Sportradar scores slightly higher (51 vs 45). iSports API is the better pick for football and basketball apps that need livescores, fixtures, lineups, odds and history from a self-serve API with a free trial.
- Which is cheaper, Sportradar or iSports API?
- Sportradar: Price not public. iSports API: from $49/mo. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do Sportradar and iSports API have a free tier?
- Sportradar: not disclosed. iSports API: no.