vs
OpenDota vs Data Sports Group (2026)
Short answer: OpenDota scores clearly higher overall (56 vs 30). Data Sports Group is the better pick for media, gaming and fantasy businesses that want one commercial feed covering many sports and competitions, including niche and Olympic sports, with ready-made widgets.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose OpenDota if you…
Esports data
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
- ✓ care most about what developers report in practice
What developers say
Open-source Dota 2 data API widely used in hobby apps, ML projects and Stack Overflow questions. Praised as an excellent, flexible resource with parsed match data and estimated MMR. Free use is rate limited (about 60 requests per minute), and users report 429 errors, occasional unresponsiveness and trouble obtaining a premium key.
Choose Data Sports Group if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Media, gaming and fantasy businesses that want one commercial feed covering many sports and competitions, including niche and Olympic sports, with ready-made widgets.
- ✓ need Football (soccer), Cricket, Basketball
- ✓ need live / in-play data
- ✓ need an enterprise feed with a contract and SLA-style support
Not ideal for: Developers wanting self-serve signup or published pricing; packages are customised on request and trial access goes through a contact form.
What developers say
Commercial multi-sport data feed with widgets, sold by quote. No independent user opinion exists. The digest holds only vendor-style marketing posts, a Chainlink oracle demo by a third party, and a couple of small repos, so pricing, quality and support are unknown.
Side by side
| OpenDota | Data Sports Group | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 56/100 (#29) | 30/100 (#142) |
| Popularity | 38 | 26 |
| Community & reliability | 76 | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 50 | 45 |
| Developer experience | 67 | 21 |
| Type | Esports data | B2B data feed |
| Starting price | Free tier | Contact sales |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Esports | Football (soccer), Cricket, Basketball, Tennis, Rugby, Motorsport, Esports, Multi-sport (40+) |
| Data | Historical data, Player stats, Results, Team stats | Fixtures, Historical data, Player stats, Results, Live scores, Standings, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Polling only (REST) | Not disclosed |
| Protocols | REST | Not disclosed |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: not disclosed | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 16 | 2 |
| GitHub repos | 500 | 2 |
| Community tone | Mostly positive | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is OpenDota or Data Sports Group better?
- OpenDota scores clearly higher overall (56 vs 30). Data Sports Group is the better pick for media, gaming and fantasy businesses that want one commercial feed covering many sports and competitions, including niche and Olympic sports, with ready-made widgets.
- Which is cheaper, OpenDota or Data Sports Group?
- OpenDota: Free tier. Data Sports Group: Contact sales. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do OpenDota and Data Sports Group have a free tier?
- OpenDota: yes. Data Sports Group: not disclosed.