vs
DATA.BET vs OddsMatrix (2026)
Short answer: DATA.BET scores clearly higher overall (50 vs 32). OddsMatrix is the better pick for bookmakers and sportsbook platforms that need pre-match and live odds, scores and settlement feeds, or a historical odds archive, under a negotiated contract.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose DATA.BET if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Licensed sportsbook operators that want a managed odds feed, risk management and widgets across sports, esports and virtual sports.
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
Not ideal for: Individual developers or small apps wanting self-serve access; the service is B2B with partner integration and no public pricing.
What developers say
B2B sportsbook odds feed supplier. The only digest items are GitHub repos matched on a generic name, with nothing showing they use this provider. No community discussion, reviews or pricing feedback was found.
Choose OddsMatrix if you…
B2B data feed
Best for: Bookmakers and sportsbook platforms that need pre-match and live odds, scores and settlement feeds, or a historical odds archive, under a negotiated contract.
- ✓ want a 30-day free trial before paying
- ✓ need live / in-play data
Not ideal for: Individual developers or small projects wanting self-serve pricing and public docs; access is quote-based.
What developers say
EveryMatrix's odds and sports data feed for operators. Only a PHP connector repo and a vendor video appear; there is no user discussion of quality, price or reliability.
Side by side
| DATA.BET | OddsMatrix | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 50/100 (#46) | 32/100 (#131) |
| Popularity | 54 | 28 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 55 | 45 |
| Developer experience | 37 | 26 |
| Type | B2B data feed | B2B data feed |
| Starting price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free tier | Not disclosed | No |
| Free trial | Demo access | 30 days |
| Sports | Esports, Multi-sport (40+) | Football (soccer), Basketball, Tennis, Volleyball, Handball, American football, Baseball, Ice hockey, Cricket, Golf, Table tennis, Esports, Multi-sport (40+) |
| Data | Trading & risk, Odds, Predictions, Widgets | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Results, Live scores, Widgets |
| Delivery | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Protocols | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Live / in-play | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Licence required | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: not disclosed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Not found |
| Developer discussions | 0 | 0 |
| GitHub repos | 581 | 1 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is DATA.BET or OddsMatrix better?
- DATA.BET scores clearly higher overall (50 vs 32). OddsMatrix is the better pick for bookmakers and sportsbook platforms that need pre-match and live odds, scores and settlement feeds, or a historical odds archive, under a negotiated contract.
- Which is cheaper, DATA.BET or OddsMatrix?
- DATA.BET: Contact sales. OddsMatrix: Contact sales. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do DATA.BET and OddsMatrix have a free tier?
- DATA.BET: not disclosed. OddsMatrix: no.