vs
PandaScore vs Abios (2026)
Short answer: PandaScore scores clearly higher overall (65 vs 28). Abios is the better pick for esports betting operators in regulated markets that want pre-match, live and historical esports data with odds and widgets from a sales-led vendor.
From public data checked . How we know
Choose PandaScore if you…
Esports data
Best for: Esports apps and stats sites that need schedules, results and post-match data per game, with a free fixtures tier and an optional live WebSocket feed.
- ✓ want to start on a free tier
- ✓ prefer public, self-serve pricing over a sales call
- ✓ want WebSocket push instead of polling
- ✓ value a large open-source ecosystem of wrappers and examples
Not ideal for: Building odds or betting products from the stats plans; those plans bar betting use and redistribution, so betting customers must go through sales.
What developers say
Esports data provider with REST API covering LoL, CS, Dota and others. Seen in dev questions for upcoming-match apps and a few GitHub wrappers and bots. Community remarks are sparse and mostly old: one user notes odds are paywalled, and it appears as one of few usable esports APIs. No real user verdict on quality or pricing.
Choose Abios if you…
Esports data
Best for: Esports betting operators in regulated markets that want pre-match, live and historical esports data with odds and widgets from a sales-led vendor.
Not ideal for: Developers wanting self-serve signup or public pricing; there are no published prices and the site says Abios has moved to kambi.com.
What developers say
B2B esports data provider. Thin evidence: a 2018 user says its focus is selling the API rather than a consumer calendar, and a few old community wrappers exist (Python, Clojure). A recent live-esports service repo is the only newer sign of use. Little current user opinion.
Side by side
| PandaScore | Abios | |
|---|---|---|
| SportDex Score | 65/100 (#9) | 28/100 (#148) |
| Popularity | 53 | 32 |
| Community & reliability | Not enough data | Not enough data |
| Transparency | 90 | 25 |
| Developer experience | 61 | 23 |
| Type | Esports data | Esports data |
| Starting price | from €400/mo | Contact sales |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Sports | Esports | Esports |
| Data | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Play-by-play, Results, Live scores, Team stats | Fixtures, Historical data, Odds, Player props, Results, Team stats, Widgets |
| Delivery | Streaming (WebSocket) | Not disclosed |
| Protocols | REST, WebSocket | Not disclosed |
| Live / in-play | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Commercial: Paid plans only | Commercial: not disclosed |
| Betting products | Betting: Not allowed | Betting: not disclosed |
| Documentation | Docs | Docs |
| Developer discussions | 8 | 1 |
| GitHub repos | 195 | 11 |
| Community tone | Too little discussion | Too little discussion |
Empty fields mean the provider does not say, not that the feature is missing.
Quick answers
- Is PandaScore or Abios better?
- PandaScore scores clearly higher overall (65 vs 28). Abios is the better pick for esports betting operators in regulated markets that want pre-match, live and historical esports data with odds and widgets from a sales-led vendor.
- Which is cheaper, PandaScore or Abios?
- PandaScore: from €400/mo. Abios: Contact sales. Entry plans differ in limits and coverage, so compare what each plan includes.
- Do PandaScore and Abios have a free tier?
- PandaScore: yes. Abios: not disclosed.